media

How "Law and Order" Gets it Wrong

14Dec2009

When we think of sexual assault, the last thing we should
think about is television. Unfortunately, it may be one of the first things to
cross our minds.

The fact of the matter is, if you ask a random person about
sexual assault, they might tell you the extent of their expertise is a “Law and
Order: SVU” marathon they caught over holiday break. In these episodes, we’re
taken through a horrific crime, a thrilling suspension of habeas corpus by
Detective Spitzer, and a tear-jerking closing argument in the courtroom. The
accused sits apprehensively next to his lawyers and awaits the verdict. Guilty
or innocent. Jail or freedom. Right or wrong.

There are four major problems with this.

1. Shows like this frame sexual assault as a judiciary issue
rather than a moral one.

Syndicate content